Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bruce

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 26, 1998PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

In this appeal, appellant, Kenneth Bruce, asks us to determine whether a shownip conducted in a hospital waiting room was unduly suggestive and unreliable, warranting the suppression of the subsequent identification. We are also asked to determine whether appellant’s conduct at the show-up constituted “concealment,” thereby warranting a jury charge, which would allow the jury to infer appellant’s consciousness of guilt. We hold that (1) the show-up at the Veteran’s Administration (V.A.) Hospital was not unduly suggestive; and, (2) the totality of the circumstances demonstrates…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SampleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. HarteySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. ThompkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. MonroeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ValentineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. SandersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. HanfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Albarran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API