Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hartey

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1993No. 1078PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence for first degree murder, 1 criminal conspiracy, 2 and possession of an instrument of crime. 3 Appellant, Patrick Hartey, raises six issues on appeal.

I. [Whether] trial counsel was ineffective for failing to preserve his objections to the improper bolstering of the Barth preliminary hearing testimony in his written post trial motions, and was also ineffective for failing to object to the improper bolstering in her opening address?

II. [Whether] trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the court’s exclusion of defense…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. CoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. RandallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. KimSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. BruceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API