Legal Opinion

Nott v. Gundick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1921No. Docket No. 54PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Richter (Theodore J.), J. Bill by Lettie Nott against Martha Gundick for partition of certain real estate: On appeal of defendant from an order affirming an award of the commissioner on settlement of the decree.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Following decree for partition in this cause affirmed here, 212 Mich. 223, there was reference to a circuit court commissioner and report by him that the property was not susceptible of division and there was further reference to take testimony as to the rental value of the property, amount of attorneys’ fees to be allowed plaintiff and expense of abstract. Upon petition of defendant the order of reference was broadened to include taxes paid and repairs made by her. The commissioner took the testimony offered by the parties and made his report. Both parties filed exceptions to the report…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fenton v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Nott v. GundickMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Liebetreu v. LiebetreuMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Jackson v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Dickerson v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Morse Chain Co. v. Formsprag Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Kadri v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API