Legal Opinion
State v. Spencer
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 30, 2003No. 2002-288PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The defendant, Geraldine Spencer, appeals from her conviction of one count of forgery, see RSA 638:1 (1996), and one count of theft by unauthorized taking, see RSA 637:3 (1996). She argues that the Superior Court (Smukler, J.) erred by denying her motions to suppress her pr e-Miranda statement and silence and her post -Miranda confession. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). We affirm.
The following facts were adduced at the suppression hearing. Detective Kristian Kelley and Sergeant Kevin Keenan went to the defendant’s house to arrest her for forging checks stolen from a customer at a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- United States v. Jean M. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HamblyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ZwickerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- State v. GribbleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State v. RezkSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.