Legal Opinion
State v. Rezk
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 30, 2004No. 2002-618PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.
The defendant, Michael Rezk, appeals his convictions by a jury on one count of theft by receiving stolen property, see RSA 637:7 (1996) (amended 2001), one count of attempted burglary, see RSA 635:1 (1996); RSA 629:1 (Supp. 2003), two counts of felon in possession of a dangerous weapon, see RSA 159:3 (2002), and one count of felonious use of a firearm, see RSA 650-A:l (1996). On appeal, he contends that the Superior Court (McHugh, J.) erroneously denied his motion to suppress his confessions. We affirm in part, reverse in part, vacate in part and remand for resentencing.
I
The following facts…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. MontejoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
- State v. YatesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. HolmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.