Legal Opinion

Herring v. Cumberland Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 28, 1912PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeat, by defendants from Ward, J., at October Term, 1911, of SAMPSON. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice Walker.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This action was brought to recover the amount of a penalty, imposed by a contract between the plaintiff and the Wallace Manufacturing Company, for failure to comply with one of its stipulations. The question involved arose upon the following facts:

Plaintiff and ceftain other neighboring landowners agreed to sell the timber on their lands to the said company for a stated price, and defendant agreed to pay the price and also to construct a standard-gauge railroad from Delway to Wallace, and to complete the same for use and transportation on or before 15 March,' 1908, and, upon-failure to do so,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parkersburg v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Tracy v. . TalmageNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. Voorhees v. Porter.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Morville v. American Tract SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  5. Lester v. Howard BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bolich v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Cauble v. . TrexlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Jenkins v. TranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Russell v. . MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Garland v. . Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API