Legal Opinion
Royal Insurance Co. v. Pinette
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 10, 2000PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWathen, C.J.
¶ 1 Geraldine Pinette, Robert Matthews, and Patricia Wilson, the personal representatives for the estates of Kevin Pinette, Dana Matthews and Nicholas Patenaude, respectively, appeal from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Crowley, /.) finding that Royal Insurance Company had no duty to indemnify its insured, Sabato Raia, for any liability for shooting and killing Pinette, Matthews and Patenaude in June of 1997. The Estates argue that though Raia acted intentionally, and though the homeowner’s insurance policy issued to Raia by Royal did not cover bodily…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Patrons-Oxford Mutual Insurance v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Gibson v. Farm Family Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Massachusetts Bay Insurance v. Ferraiolo Construction Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Johnson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Northern Security Insurance Co. v. DolleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Morse Bros., Inc. v. WebsterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Vermont Mutual Insurance v. WalukiewiczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Medeika v. WattsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Blanchard v. SawyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Korhonen v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.