People v. Matthews
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Wachtler.
The defendant has been convicted, after a jury trial, of robbery and related offenses in connection with a hold-up of a bar. The Appellate Division affirmed the conviction and the defendant appeals. The defendant’s primary contention is that he was denied a fair trial when the prosecutor cross-examining him made a "surprise inquiry” concerning an unrelated robbery in another State. The defendant urges that we reexamine the rule announced in People v Sandoval (34 NY2d 371) and shift the burden to the prosecutor of obtaining prior court approval before…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. VidalNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
3Cited by46 opinions
- People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matthews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. MorganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. AlhadiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.