Gibralter Colorado Life Co. v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
LOONEY, Justice.
At the outset, plaintiff moves the court to strike out defendant’s propositions Nos. 1 to 10, inclusive, on the ground that they are mere abstractions. This motion is overruled, as it has been several times held that, since the amendment (Acts 1931, c. 45, § 1) to article 1757, R.S. (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 1757), propositions are not essential parts of a brief. Standard v. Texas Pacific, etc., Co. (Tex.Civ.App.) 47 S.W.(2d) 443; Robert, etc., Co. v. Bains (Tex.Civ.App.) 57 S.W.(2d) 872; Henderson v. Page (Tex.Civ.App.) 78 S.W.(2d) 293.
W. W. Taylor, beneficiary, sued the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Southland Life Ins. Co. v. NortonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Bailey v. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the WorldTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- International Harvester Co. of America v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Bailey v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
- Standard v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Colorado Life Co. v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Gibralter Colorado Life Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Colorado Life Co. v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Medina Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. ReaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963