Legal Opinion
D'Agostino v. Housing Authority of Waterbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 6, 2006No. AC 26440PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, J.
The plaintiff, Attilio D’Agostino, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his two count complaint against the defendant, the housing authority of the city of Waterbury, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
In the spring of 1995, the plaintiff commenced his employment with the defendant as a maintenance mechanic, which continued for the next eight years. In January, 2004, the plaintiff accepted a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Hunt v. PriorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Neiman v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Klein v. State Ex Rel. Montana Department of CorrectionsMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Greene v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Fiorillo v. HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- FERRUCCI v. Town of MiddleburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Waterbury v. BrennanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.