Legal Opinion
Murray v. Roedel
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
Petitioner, James Murray, brings this proceeding pursuant to section 964 of the Penal Law for an order enjoining and restraining the respondent from conducting the business of teaching dancing under the assumed business name of “ The Arthur Murray School of Dancing ” in the city of Albany, New-York, from maintaining and displaying the name “ Arthur Murray ” on premises numbered 31 and/or 33 Elk Street in said city and from causing to be purchased and published such advertisements as shall mislead and deceive the public into believing that one Arthur Murray is actually conducting the business…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Overseas News Agency, Inc. v. Overseas Press, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1944
- Bill's Gay Nineties, Inc. v. FisherNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Broderick v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Fainblatt v. Leo Sportswear Co.New York Supreme Court · 1942
- Agash Refining Corp. v. Abraham GashNew York Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rayco Manufacturing Co. v. Layco Auto Seat Cover Center, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Heimowitz v. Steri-Clean Diaper Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Consumer Profit Sharing Co. v. Original Green Stamp Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960