Broderick v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and ■ disbursements. We hold that the action of the Budget Director in creating the additional positions involved herein without the specific approval of the Board of Estimate was not sanctioned by law. This renders it unnecessary for us to pass on the other questions at issue. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon. Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [182 Mise. 990.] [See post, p. 894.] In the Matter of Richard Welling, Respondent, against Patrick Walsh, as Commissioner of the Fire Department of the City of New York, et al., Appellants; Richard B.…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Association of Contracting Plumbers of the City of New York, Inc. v. Contracting Plumbers Ass'n of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Industrial Plants Corp. v. Industrial Liquidating Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Rayco Manufacturing Co. v. Layco Auto Seat Cover Center, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Precision Apparatus Co. v. Precision Meter Co.New York Supreme Court · 1956
- Murray v. RoedelNew York Supreme Court · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.