Legal Opinion

R. W. King Construction Co. v. City of Melbourne

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 2, 1980No. 78-2010/T4-208PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORFINGER, Judge.

Defendants R. W. King Construction Company, as contractor, and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, as surety, appeal a final judgment for $49,131.94 entered in favor of plaintiff, City of Melbourne, based on a jury verdict, plus an award of $21,700 as attorney’s fees. They contend that the jury verdict was in error and clearly demonstrates a misapprehension of the evidence; that the trial court erred in awarding attorney’s fees contrary to Sec. 627.756, Florida Statutes (1975) and further *655erred in including therein an award for extraordinary fees.

At the conclusion of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Lieber's EstateSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. State v. ErpDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. In Re Estate of LungaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  4. Joseph v. Houdaille-Duval-Wright Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. OstrerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Greenberg v. GrossmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Trans-Continental Finance Corp. v. BaxterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Roberts v. International Speedway Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API