State v. Erp
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DAUKSCH, Judge..On appeal is an order granting a new trial. While we agree the trial court was correct in granting the new trial and perhaps the question of the arrest, search and seizure should be reconsidered we cannot now hold U. S. v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1, 97 S.Ct. 2476, 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977) is determinative in this matter. For that reason we affirm the order granting the new trial but do not rule Chadwick to be law of the case.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
LEFFLER, KENNETH M.,' Associate Judge, concurs. CROSS, J., concurs only in conclusion.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
3Cited by12 opinions
- Albritton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Shaw v. PetersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Blanford v. Polk CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Hartsfield v. Orlando Regional Med. Ctr.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Hannabass v. Florida Home Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.