Legal Opinion
Greenberg v. Grossman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 30, 1996No. 96-1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
683 So.2d 156 (1996)
Martin F. GREENBERG, Stanley H. Kuperstein and Karl M. Sachs, as the Majority in Interest of the General Partners and for the Use and Benefit of Kismet Apartments, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, Appellants,
v.
Harry GROSSMAN, Appellee.
No. 96-1.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
October 30, 1996.
Rehearing Denied December 4, 1996.
Roger A. Bridges, Coral Gables, for appellants.
Keith, Mack, Lewis, Cohen & Lumpkin and Norman S. Segall and Jack R. Reiter, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
2Per curiam
Appellants Greenberg, et al., challenge a…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Cheek v. McGowan Elec. Supply Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Phillips v. OstrerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- MacHado v. Foreign Trade, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Underhill Fancy Veal, Inc. v. PadotDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- R & B Holding Co. v. Christopher Advertising Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Nelson v. AmSouth BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- BMO Harris Bank, N.A. v. RichertUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- YAIR BARAK v. ACS INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS, LTD., etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021