Legal Opinion

ANR Pipeline Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 23, 1989No. Nos. 88-1031, 88-1045, 88-1211, 88-1085 and 88-1179PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS.

STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:

In October 1987 ANR Pipeline Company and Great Lakes Gas Transmission Company applied to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to extend the terms of the individual certificates of public convenience and necessity under which they were transporting imported Canadian natural gas. FERC’s disposition of the applications has raised two sets of issues. First, FERC imposed conditions, confining the certificates to a shorter period than proposed and fixing a rate for ANR much higher than it had…

2Cases cited10 opinions

Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Anr Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., Union Gas Limited, Progas Limited, Northern Minnesota Utilities, Long Island Lighting Company, Northridge Petroleum Marketing, Inc., Great Lakes Gas Transmission Co., Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Intervenors. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Union Gas Limited, Progas Limited, Anr Pipeline Company, Great Lakes Gas Transmission Co., Northridge Petroleum Marketing, Inc., Northern Minnesota Utilities, Intervenors. Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Progas Limited, Northern Minnesota Utilities, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., Great Lakes Gas Transmission Co., Northridge Petroleum Marketing, Inc., Anr Pipeline Company, Long Island Lighting Company, Intervenors. Great Lakes Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Anr Pipeline Company, Progas Limited, Michigan Gas Company, Long Island Lighting Company, Northridge Petroleum Marketing, Inc., Northern Minneso Ta Utilities, Independent Petroleum Association of America, Intervenors. Independent Petroleum Association of America v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., Progas Limited, Northern Minnesota Utilities, Transcanada Pipeline Limited, Northridge Petroleum Marketing, Inc., Great Lakes Gas Transmission Co., Union Gas Limited, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989