Legal Opinion
LizardTech, Inc. v. Earth Resource Mapping, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 4, 2005No. 2005-1062PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
LizardTech, Inc., appeals the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in this patent case. On the motion of defendants Earth Resource Mapping, Inc., and Earth Resource Mapping Pty Ltd. (collectively “ERM”), the district court granted summary judgment, holding that ERM did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,710,835 (“the ’835 patent”), and that the patent was invalid. LizardTech, Inc. v. Earth Res. Mapping, Inc., No. C99-1602C, 2000 WL 34502412 (W.D.Wash. March 14, 2004). We affirm.
I
A
The technology at issue in this case…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Merrill v. YeomansSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Dr. Raymond G. Tronzo v. Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- ICU Medical, Inc. v. Alaris Medical Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Research Corp. Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Falko-Gunter Falkner, Georg Holzer, and Friedrich Dorner v. Stephen C. Inglis, Michael E.G. Boursnell, and Anthony C. MinsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.