Legal Opinion
Marciano v. Kraner
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 18, 2011No. AC 31090PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The plaintiff, Gerald Marciano, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion filed by the defendants, Neil W. Kraner and the Law Offices of George B. Bickford, 1 to set aside the verdict reached by the jury in favor of the plaintiff. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that, in the absence of expert testimony, he could not prevail in his action for breach of fiduciary duty against the defendants. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hunt v. PriorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Malmberg v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Label Systems Corp. v. Samad AghamohammadiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Carrano v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Matza v. MatzaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- O'Dell v. KozeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Gagliano v. Advanced Specialty Care, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Rawls v. Progressive Northern InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Bozelko v. PapastavrosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Kalra v. Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.