Legal Opinion

Walsh v. IKON Office Solutions, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 2007No. A113172PublishedCited by 40 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEMELLO, J.

Plaintiffs Ryan Walsh (Walsh) and Kevin Miller (Miller), on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, appeal from an order decertifying one of several subclasses in their class action against respondent IKON Office Solutions, Inc. (IKON). Appellants contend: (1) the order is erroneous because it fails to identify sufficiently the court’s reasons for decertification; (2) the evidence does not support the trial court’s conclusion; and (3) IKON’s motion was untimely and procedurally defective in its failure to comply with local rules of the San Francisco Superior…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.California Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Duran v. U.S. Bank National Assn.California Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Bradley v. Networkers International, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Dailey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API