Legal Opinion
Oklahoma City v. Richardson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 23, 1937No. 25399PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BATLESS, Y. C. J.
Josephine Eichard-son instituted 'an action in the district court of Oklahoma county, Okla., against the city of Oklahoma City, a municipal corporation, to recover dam'ages sustained by reason of the death of her husband, Henry Bichard-son, whose death she alleged was attributable to the negligence of the city.
It is a sufficient statement of the facts to day that the husband’s death occurred as a result of a collision between an automobile belonging to the city, driven by one of its police officers, and an automobile in which the husband was riding. The negligence charged to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Oklahoma City v. HaggardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- White v. McGeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Alko-Nak Coal Co. v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Whitehead Coal & Mining Co. v. WintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Ardmore v. HendrixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Potter v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Darby Petroleum Co. v. BowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- City of Tulsa v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Rake v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.