Legal Opinion

Martin v. Cedar Lake Ice Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 1920No. 21,755PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $5,000 for malicious prosecution of a civil action. At the trial defendants’ separate motions for judgment on the pleadings were granted, Eish, J. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Action for malicious prosecution of a civil action. The court granted *453defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, and plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff alleged that, when he was adjudged a bankrupt in the fall of 1914, he owed the defendant Cedar Lake Ice Company $59.33; that the company filed its claim in the bankruptcy proceeding, and on March 31, 1915, was paid by the trustee therein, $9.01, its pro rata share of the estate; that on February 13, 1915, plaintiff was duly discharged from all provable claims and debts by the bankruptcy court;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spaids v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Noblett v. BartschWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Nelson v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Pixley v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  5. Rossiter v. Minnesota Bradner-Smith Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Occhino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  2. Linder v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. Nelson v. National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Behrendt v. RassmussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Henry v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API