Kansas, Nebraska & Dakota Railway Co. v. Cuykendall
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Anderson District Court. The opinion states the case. Judgment for plaintiff Cwyhendall at the March term, 1887, for $190 damages. The defendant Company brings the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Simpson, C.:
Cuykendall commenced his action in the district court of Anderson county, alleging that he was the owner in fee simple of the north half of lots 9,10,11 and 12, in block 76, in the city of Garnett; that said lots front 70 feet on Main street and 180 on Seventh avenue, are improved by a dwelling-house, fencing and otherwise, and are occupied by plaintiff and his family as a residence; that the dwelling-house faces on Main street, and the outlet and inlet to the property is over and upon these two streets; that the railroad company, on or about the 1st day of March, 1886,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Uline v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Kansas Pacific Railway v. MihlmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Fearing v. . IrwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Atchison & Nebraska Railroad v. GarsideSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- C. B. U. P. Rld. Co. v. TwineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Siegenthaler v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- State Ex Rel. Herman v. SchafferArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Foster Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Valley & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Marshall v. Wichita & Midland Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Stephenson v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.