Fearing v. . Irwin
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] In these cases of a submission of a controversy without action, the court is confined to the facts agreed upon, and can make no inferences, or in any way depart from or go beyond the statement presented. (Clark v. Wise, 46 N Y, 612.) Hence the admission that, when the Bloomingdale road and Apthorp's lane shall have been closed by law, the title to the abutting half of each of them will revert to the Fearing estate, is of controlling effect. It is an admission…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- The People v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Coster v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
3Cited by56 opinions
- City of Chicago v. Union Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Heller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Archenhold Automobile Supply Co. v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Stanwood v. City of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Marietta Chair Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.