Legal Opinion

United States v. Correll

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 11, 1967No. 113PublishedCited by 716 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue has long maintained that a taxpayer traveling on business may deduct the cost of his meals only if his trip requires him to stop for sleep or rest. The question presented here is the validity of that rule.

*300The respondent in this case was a traveling salesman for a wholesale grocery company in Tennessee.1 He customarily left home early in the morning, ate breakfast and lunch on the road, and returned home in time for dinner. In his income tax returns for 1960 and 1961, he deducted the cost of his morning and noon meals as “traveling expenses” incurred in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Helvering v. WinmillSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Commissioner v. StidgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Fribourg Navigation Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. George Harvey James v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by716 opinions

  1. Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bingler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. National Muffler Dealers Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. SloanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

711 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API