Tappeiner v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hearn
A Beaufort County jury convicted Susan Tappeiner of criminal sexual conduct (CSC) with a minor, second degree. Tappeiner withdrew her direct appeal and filed an application for post-conviction relief (PCR), asserting, inter alia, that her trial counsel was deficient in failing to object to the State’s improper remarks during closing arguments. The PCR court denied her relief, finding that although trial counsel was deficient in failing to object, Tappeiner was not prejudiced by the deficient performance. We reverse.
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In February 2009, Victim informed his school…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019
- Reese v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- State v. CollierCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- State v. ReyesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020