Legal Opinion

Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 13, 1962No. A.R.D. 140; Entry No. 3176, etcPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foed, Judge:

This application for review of the decision and judgment of the trial court, which was reported in 45 Oust. Ct. 405, Reap. Dec. 9727, filed under the provisions of title 28, U.S.C., section 2636(a), covers the appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof. The merchandise consists of canned baby clams, imported from Japan. Appraisement was predicated upon the American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938.

*690It is conceded that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Hoyt v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Arthur J. Fritz & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Converse Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API