Legal Opinion

Kenai Peninsula Borough v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1987No. S-1207, S-1216PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and BURKE, COMPTON, and MATTHEWS, JJ. RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

At issue in this appeal is the validity of the 1984 state legislative reapportionment plan which was promulgated in an attempt to comply with our decision in Carpenter v. Hammond, 667 P.2d 1204 (Alaska), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 464 U.S. 801, 104 S.Ct. 45, 78 L.Ed.2d 67 (1983). This appeal challenges the constitutionality of the plan’s realignment of Southeastern Alaska; the creation of House District 7, the North Kenai-South Anchorage District; and the creation of…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Memphis Community School District v. StachuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Whitcomb v. ChavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. League of Women Voters of PA v. CmwlthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Fonfara v. Reapportionment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Hickel v. Southeast ConferenceAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API