Legal Opinion

Fonfara v. Reapportionment Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 26, 1992No. 14421PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The principal issue in this case is whether this court should overturn a plan for reapportionment of the state house of representatives without a prima facie showing that the plan manifests an improper reconciliation of the federal constitutional principle of one person, one vote, with the state constitutional principle of town integrity. The petitioners, who are citizens and electors of the state, have invoked the original jurisdiction conferred upon this court by article third, § 6 (d) of the Connecticut constitution, as amended, “to correct any error made in [the commission’s] plan of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Pearson v. KosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Sheff v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Connecticut Coalition for Justice in Education Funding, Inc. v. RellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. Waterbury Teachers Ass'n v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API