Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Sutherland v. Ford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1910No. Docket No. 110PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Sessions, J.. Information in the nature of quo warranto on the relation of Alexander Sutherland, prosecuting attorney, against Joseph C. Ford, Jr., to determine the right of respondent to the office of village trustee. Judgment for respondent, and relator brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is a proceeding in the Muskegon circuit by information in the nature of quo warranto against" Joseph C. Ford, Jr., to determine his right to hold the office of trustee of the village of Fruitport, a village organized under the general act relating to the incorporation,' powers, and duties of villages within this State. • A vacancy having occurred in the office of trustee, the council of the village ordered a special election for the purpose of electing a trustee to fill such vacancy. The election was held, and respondent Joseph C. Ford, Jr., received a majority of the votes cast at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pariseau v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Birdsell Manufacturing Co. v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Texas Company v. C.F. SiefriedWyoming Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Forbes v. KaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API