Legal Opinion

Pariseau v. Board of Education

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to rescind a resolution declaring James R. Champ entitled to a seat'on said board, and to admit relator as a member thereof. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDong, J.

Relator asks the writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to rescind a motion adopted by it May 3, 1893, declaring one James R. Champ entitled to the seat . on said board held by • relator, and to compel the respondent to admit him as a member of the board.

In the petition it is claimed that relator was duly elected a member of the board at a charter election held in the city of Escanaba in April, 1892, for the term of two years; that he duly qualified and acted as a member of the board until prevented by the action of the board, seating Mr. Champ in his place. Relator further sets up in his…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ashwell v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Keeler v. DeoMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Lachance v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. People ex rel. Sutherland v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Hartwig v. Mayor of ManisteeMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API