Legal Opinion
Texas Company v. C.F. Siefried
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 1944No. 2276PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Riner, Justice.
This is a proceeding by direct appeal to review a judgment of the district court of Laramie County. The action in that court was commenced by The Texas Company, a Corporation, as plaintiff, against Frank Kelso, as State Highway Superintendent, and Ewing T. Kerr, as State Attorney General,. as defendants. Other persons and corporations were also named as defendants but so far as this proceeding is concerned, and the questions at present involved, they may be regarded as aligned with The Texas Company hereinafter usually designated as the “plaintiff”. Due to changes in…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Southern Pacific Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Gregg Dyeing Co. v. QuerySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Danculovich v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Druley v. HoudesheldtWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
- Kuntz v. KinneWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
- Woolley v. State Highway CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- United States of America, Intrigue Trading, Inc., Claimant-Appellee v. 4,432 Mastercases of Cigarettes, More or Less, United States of America, Intrigue Trading, Inc., Claimant-Appellant v. 4,432 Mastercases of Cigarettes, More or Less, United States of America, Intrigue Trading, Inc., Claimant-Appellee v. 4,432 Mastercases of Cigarettes, More or LessCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.