Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Dykes v. Hosemann

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 18, 1985No. 83-3347Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part in which FAY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, join:

I join in the majority’s affirmance of the district judge’s dismissal of Judge Hosemann from this case because I find that, in addition to being immune from a section 1983 suit, Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 101 S.Ct. 1908, 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981), mandates that the suit against him be dismissed. I dissent, however, from the majority’s remand of the ease as to the other appellees because I also read Parratt as requiring that the claims against the remaining appellees be dismissed,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API