Legal Opinion
Barnett v. Whatley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 28, 1953No. 34322, 34327PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.
The cross-bill of exceptions assigns error upon exceptions pendente lite to a purported order of the court overruling the plaintiff’s special demurrer to paragraph 17 of the defendant’s answer. The record shows that this order was not signed by the judge presiding. There was no judgment which could be excepted to, and therefore the cross-bill must be dismissed.
However, the question of the sufficiency of paragraph 17 of the answer is presented by ground 4 of the motion for a new trial, which complains of the exclusion of evidence in support of that paragraph the allegations of which were to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Russell v. BayneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. Wallace & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Crew v. HutchesonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Tyson v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Georgia Power Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harmon v. GivensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Yandle v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Wren Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Midland-Guardian Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Barnett v. WhatleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953