Legal Opinion

Wren Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Midland-Guardian Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 30, 1967No. 42943PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whitman, Judge.

In filing its general demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition, as amended, the defendant relies upon the contention that the plaintiff ratified the alleged wrongful acts of the defendant as shown on the face of the petition and, therefore, as a matter of law the plaintiff cannot withdraw such ratification and look to the defendant for reimbursement.

Both parties rely upon well established legal principles. An agent who violates or exceeds the instructions of his principal will be liable to the principal for any damage or loss occasioned thereby. Hardeman v. Ford, 12 Ga. 205 (1);…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. OuztsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  2. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. Wallace & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Dixon v. Bristol Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Oxford v. ShumanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Warner v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Travis Pruitt & Associates, P.C. v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Stinespring v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Chicago Insurance v. CamorsDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969
  4. Harrison v. Piedmont Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Kohlmeyer v. LightfootCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API