Harmon v. Givens
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.
1. Ground 4 of the amended motion for new trial complains of the admission in evidence of section 38 of the Traffic Code of the City of Albany, introduced by the plaintiff over the objection by the defendant that this ordinance had not been pleaded in the case. Section 38 is as follows: “The signal required by Section 37 of this Chapter shall be given either by means of the hand or arm or by a signal lamp or signalling device of a type approved by the City, but when a vehicle is so constructed or loaded that a hand and arm signal would not be visible both to the front and rear of such vehicle…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City Council v. TharpeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Donaldson v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. OuztsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Edmondson v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Millen & Southwestern Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mendel v. PinkardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Price v. BakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Butler v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1956
- Sims v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Smallwood v. BickersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.