Legal Opinion

Magnolia Provision Co. v. Coleman

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1928No. 898-4731PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.

Defendants in error brought, this suit for the recovery of damages claimed to have resulted on account of an alleged breach by plaintiff in error of three contracts under which it was obligated to sell and deliver to defendants in error 409 bales of ’cotton linters, which it was alleged it failed and refused to deliver in accordance with the terms of the purchase contract. It was averred that the sale contracts were made originally by the plaintiff in error with Hughes-Coleman Linters Corporation, and that the latter subsequently sold the same to defendants in error.

It appears from the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scottish Union & National Insurance v. ClancyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Oltmanns Bros. v. PolandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Haynes v. Plano Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Dallas Waste Mills v. Early-Foster Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Tennant v. FawcettTexas Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Kiser v. Lemco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Sanitary Appliance Co. v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Grindstaff v. MatherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  5. Sugarland Industries, Inc. v. FalcoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API