Gallo v. Rosell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Tuckahoe dated March 8, 2006, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioners’ application for area variances, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lippman, J.), entered September 29, 2006, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
*515Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Local zoning boards have broad discretion in considering applications for variances, and judicial review is limited to determining whether the action…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- MATTER OF SASSO v. OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Ifrah v. UtschigNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Pecoraro v. Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Halperin v. City of New RochelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Rivero v. VoelkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Matejko v. Board of Zoning AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Genser v. Board of Zoning AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Kearney v. Village of Cold Spring Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Kearney v. KitaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Monroe Beach, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.