Legal Opinion
State v. Hendrickson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 31, 1998No. C9-98-47PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this appeal from a judgment of conviction for theft in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.52, subd. 2(1) (1996), appellant argues that the district court erred when it denied his motion to suppress statements he made to police officers and evidence recovered as a result of those statements. We conclude that some of the statements appellant made to police officers should have been suppressed. But because we also conclude that the remaining admissible evidence sustains the judgment of conviction, we affirm.
FACTS
At approximately 6:30 p.m., William King reported to the Blaine…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Commonwealth v. Guthrie G.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- State v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999