Legal Opinion
State v. Hookom
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 27, 1991No. C9-91-798PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
The state appeals from a pretrial order granting respondent Derek James Hook-om’s motions to suppress statements made by Hookom and to dismiss for lack of probable cause. We reverse and remand with instructions.
FACTS
On January 5, 1991, at 1:27 p.m., E.I. contacted the St. Cloud Police Department and reported to Investigator Peter Legus that she had been sexually assaulted. She told him she had attended a party the previous evening at her cousin’s fraternity house. She stated she had arrived at around 10:30 p.m. At approximately 1 a.m., she was introduced to Hookom and had…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Welfare of C.M.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. PlummerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. RoersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- In Re CMACourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003