Legal Opinion

R. H. McWilliams, Jr., Co. v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided April 1, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

This is a renewal of the matter' reported ante p. 281, 196 A. 813. What the absent witnesses will testify to and what the documentary evidence will disclose, if of any relevancy, is still left in a state of bare affirmation by the receivers on information and belief. While affidavits are filed in support of the application the affiants state nothing definite in the way of information obtained from either witnesses or documents. A commission is sought in order that information may be probed for. The attempt is to ask the court to issue a commission to find out if something in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. R. H. McWilliams, Jr., Co. v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. WarrickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  2. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. WarrickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1941
  3. In re Missori-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API