Legal Opinion
Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. Warrick
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided October 11, 1938PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, C. J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The application of Warrick for an allowance for his services and expenses was fully heard by the Chancellor, and his order was in the nature of a decretal order. Allied Chem. & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co., 14 Del. Ch. 368, 127 A. 414. The rule of Chancery practice is that there can be no re-hearing of a decree or order of the court after it has been enrolled. Until enrollment, it is not a record of the court, and may be changed on a re-hearing. Daniels’ Ch. Pr., (6th Am. Ed.) 1475. After enrollment, the remedy is by bill of review. Cochran…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Arnold v. SkaggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Schaefer v. WunderleIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Dexter v. ArnoldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1829
- State v. MatkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. LynchDelaware Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1925
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Levine v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Radio Corp. of America v. Philadelphia Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Conner v. BrownSuperior Court of Delaware · 1938
- Kennedy v. Emerald Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1944
- Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. WarrickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.