Day v. Cole
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Ottawa. (Arnold, J.) Oross-bill dismissed and decree below reversed and modified so as to conform to opinion. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The original bill in this cause was filed September 12, 1881. It was defended by Edward Cole, Luman Jenison, Josephine M. Perkins, and Orleans L. Jordan. The bill was taken as confessed as to all the other defendants. The original cross-bill was filed June 29, 1882. The defendant Orleans L. Jordan appeared, and filed his answer, and the complainant replied thereto. The bill was taken as confessed as to all the other defendants.
November 14, 1882, an order was made that proofs and hearing be taken and had on said bills and answers, and that the same be taken and heard together. The proofs were…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Stitzel v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- Boyd v. GosserSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
- Porter's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Day v. DeJongeMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Commonwealth v. SnyderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.