Boyd v. Gosser
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
Ellis. J,
— Upon the first hearing of this cáse we affirmed the decree of the Chancellor by applying the rule so often announced by this' court that the findings Of the Chancellor on the evidence will not be disturbed unless such findings of fact are clearly shown to be erroneous. We stated in the opinion that there was much apparently credible positive evidence in the record to the effect that the signatures to the two documents involved were genuine. Both the rule and the statement of fact are correct, but the error in the conclusion arrived at upon the first hearing consisted in treating…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stitzel v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- Hanriot v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
- Succession of McDonoghSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1866
- McKay v. . LasherNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- In re the Proof & Probate of the Last Will & Testament of BurtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Travis v. TravisSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
- Florida National Bank v. SherouseSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Midland Valley Railroad v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Schaefer v. VoyleSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.