Legal Opinion
California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Alco Pacific, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 4, 2004No. CV 01-9294 SJOPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
OTERO, District Judge.
This is a cost recovery action brought by the State of California, Department of Toxic Substances Control (“DTSC” or “the state”), pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). (Order of March 5, 2003.) The state seeks reimbursement of costs incurred cleaning the site of a former lead processing facility in Carson, California, as well as a declaration that it is entitled to recoup any costs it may incur in the future for clean-up of the same facility. (Id.) Defendants 1 are moving for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- OBG Technical Services, Inc. v. Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp. Ex Rel. TRW, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
- Incorporated Village of Garden City v. Genesco, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- George Landt, individually and as co-trustee of the Landt Family Trust; et al. v. M&E Brothers, LLC; et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2026