Legal Opinion

Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Greenfield

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1934No. Appeal, 213PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This action in replevin was to determine title to notes and bonds admitted to have been stolen from plaintiff’s assured, to whom plaintiff paid the value of the property as required under its insurance liability.

The material facts in this appeal are so nearly identical with those in Gordon, Secretary of Banking, v. Mapel, 311 Pa. 523, as to bring the case within the rule there laid down and require an affirmance of the judgment. Here, as there, the uncontradicted testimony shows the property in controversy was acquired by defendant bank in due course, in good faith, before…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gordon, SEC. of Banking v. MapelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First National Bank of Blairstown v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API