Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Blairstown v. Goldberg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1940No. Appeals, 194 and 195PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

There is a singular dearth of authority in regard to the principal question involved in this case, which is whether a person who, as agent, assists another in the sale of stolen negotiable bonds, but turns over all the proceeds to his principal and acts throughout the transaction innocently and in good faith, is liable for conversion of the bonds in an action by the owner.

Defendant Bernard S. Goldberg, a member of the Philadelphia bar, became acquainted with one Max Gross, who visited Goldberg’s law office and told him he was estranged from his wife, and that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Spooner v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Davis v. Pennsylvania Co., Etc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Fehr v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Girard Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Gruntal v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Union BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Cosmas v. Bloomingdales Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. United States v. Sandy Sommerville, Trading and Doing Business Under the Name and Style, New Wilmington Livestock AuctionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  4. Manor Building Corp. v. Manor Complex Associates, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. General Investment Corp. v. AngeliniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API