Legal Opinion
Ingersoll v. Coram
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
Decided August 15, 1904No. 1,757PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.
The matter now particularly before us is a motion for an interlocutory injunction. The general history of this case is sufficiently shown by the opinion disposing of the demurrers, passed down on December 30, 1903, and reported in 127 Fed. 418. Soon after the filing of the bill, a restraining order was entered, directed to all the respondents, including John H. Leyson, administrator of the estate of Andrew J. Davis within the state of Massachusetts. The restraining order is shown by the petition therefor and the docket entries in reference thereto. The petition was as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ingersoll v. CoramU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1903
- Sherman v. American Congregational Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1902
- Hale v. CoffinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1902
- Hale v. CoffinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
3Cited by2 opinions
- White v. KeownDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1919
- Watkins v. EatonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1909