Legal Opinion

Ingersoll v. Coram

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided December 30, 1903No. 1,757PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity. On demurrers to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

The pith of this suit, which is in equity, is to the effect that one Andrew J. Davis, who, in his lifetime, was a resident of the city of Butte, in the state of Montana, died in March, 1890, leaving no descendants, but an instrument which was offered for probate as his last will and testament; that this, if allowed, would have disinherited his next of kin except one brother, to whom was given the bulk of his estate; that some of the next of kin resisted the probate thereof, proceeding in the names of Henry A. Root and vSarah Maria Cummings, who were also of the next of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. StrangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Stacy v. Thrasher Ex Rel. SellersSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  3. Johnson v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Aspden v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  5. Leyson v. RootMontana Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sheley v. ShaferNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Greer Inv. Co. v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  3. Gelfand, Greer, Popko & Miller v. ShivenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. United States v. HudsonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1941
  5. White v. KeownDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API