Legal Opinion
Dolihite Ex Rel. Dolihite v. Videon
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided March 21, 1994No. Civ. A. 92-H-1398-NPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HOBBS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to redress alleged violations of plaintiffs’ constitutional rights. Pendent state claims, grounded in theories of negligence, wantonness, and respondeat superior, are also at issue. The court has jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ federal claims under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343, and over the state claims under the doctrine of supplemental jurisdiction.
All defendants have filed motions for summary judgment 1 on the basis of qualified and substantive immunity. The issues having been…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dolihite v. MaughonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Ramírez Salcedo v. Estado Libre AsociadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1996
- WYATT BY AND THROUGH RAWLINS v. RogersDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
- Dolihite v. MaughonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Dolihite v. MaughonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996