Legal Opinion

Ridilla v. Kerns

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 1959No. 2401PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVER, Chief Judge.

Appellant and his wife brought suit to recover for personal injuries sustained by the male appellant in an automobile collision. The complaint alleged that as a result of these injuries he was disabled and prevented from pursuing his employment with the Metropolitan Police Department for a period of time (approximately one month.) A jury verdict was returned in favor of the appellee and in this appeal reversible error is urged on the basis of references by appellee’s counsel in the course of trial to appellant’s sick leave benefits. These remarks and the specific errors…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ora Greene Hudson, Administratrix of the Estate of Garland Hudson, Deceased v. David Lazarus, Samuel Juster and Calvin JusterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. Union Transports, Inc. v. BraunCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Shea v. RettieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. McElwain v. CapotostoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  5. Hellmueller Baking Co. v. RisenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Psychiatric Institute of Washington v. AllenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Werner v. LaneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. Leizear v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Liimatta v. VestAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Morgan v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API